Spray for dough, climb for show.Why is there more caution without spraying?
Because spraying is a predictable recurring source of annual revenue for a tree service.Why is there more caution without spraying?
True but I coulda woulda shoulda done that 20 y ago. The reason I didn't is simply that I'm a fairly horrible delegator so I had my hands full with 1 crew doing GTW, and I don't like "chemicals"@cory
You could start a PHC program this spring and have a 3-5 year exit strategy and likely have a much better deal for yourself.
yet we all know there are scads of mid size to large tree companies doing it.I’m with Cory. Very hard to find people capable of helping manage that aren’t running their own biz. I’d also prefer small.
I don't understand it either. I have to see exactly what needs to be done, but guys I've worked with speak as vaguely as possible while describing the job, and just go for it with apparent success. And these are people I wouldn't trust to work without the owner around. I doubt myself enough to want a worthy second opinion around. It causes me a lot of stress.I've been in the green industry since '77 (if you count logging) and fair to say I know alot about the ins and outs of tree service life. And yet, how guys run successful, huge outfits with multiple cranes and heavy equipment and 20-50 people, given the inherent dangers of tree work (everything from catastrophic issues (a death or serious injury OTJ) to the mundane (you broke my driveway/the curb/my irrigation, you rutted my lawn)) not to mention the powerful sales force needed to keep that iron and those people busy, is quite frankly a mystery to me.
And speaking of the heavy iron, lotta construction co's run heavy iron every day but it stays on site for likely days or weeks at a time whereas the heavy metal tree service is moving that iron daily if not multiple times a day. The risk exposure seems enormous to my pea brain.
And while I'm noting my deficiencies, I also find it somewhat amazing that small outfits can get it done without the owner on site most of the time. At my outfit, we tended to work fairly fast, safely and efficiently with me as an open minded leader, and thereby made a profit. I wonder how other outfits get it done where the foreman is simply given an address and work order in the morning and then it is hands off all day. To employ people capable of that level of productivity I would think the accompanying compensation would be prohibitive to the bottom line. Thus, my wonder.
its only me and one other guy, no plans to let anyone go, might let some equipment go, got all the equipment and no work for it anymore@WoodCutr, I won't argue about your downsizing numbers, that all tracks. What I will say, is that you need to evaluate your people. Don't let everyone go. Climbers need ground support, if only to call the paramedics when the worst happens. Running iron is fun, but is it the best use of your skills?
Let's say you and I are working together. Crane job? I've done a total of one, so if it's super critical, that's on you, bud. Big conifers and 8hrs in picks? That's my jam right there, been doing it since before you were born, maybe let me take that one, eh?
Also try to remember that the folk you let go, just lost a job, and it ain't easy. When you're the boss, it's not just your livelihood, but those of your employees as well. Chew on it for a bit, youngster, don't make any rash decisions.
Quarterly thinking is one of the things that makes everything shitty. In big business, it's to benefit shareholders and the C suite to the detriment of everything else. In small business, it can bite you in the ass. Nothing is forever. Shit gets slow, shit speeds up, rinse, repeat. Consider what it would cost to replace the equipment when things speed up. What you already have is most likely to be the best deal cause you know what you have. Buying something used can get you stuck with someone else's problem.might let some equipment go, got all the equipment and no work for it anymore