The Official Work Pictures Thread

Pollarding is done every one to two years, not every ten years. And the cuts are made at the same place every time. It's more of a European thing so you guys should know this better than a damn Yankee.
 
Intervals can be longer, according to species and growth rate.
(And the owners economy). Most tilias are done with 6-8 year intervals.
Here you will often see very old pollards where some new top have been allowed to go above the old ones as a way to rejuvenate them.
 
Pollarding as a form of woodland management, it is like coppicing at height.

The trees are a crop of sorts. It done at a height to stop animals nibbling at the new shoots. What would be the point in trying to harvest beech timber if you were to do it every 2 years? Have you seen how much regrowth a Beech puts on over 2 years? Surely an Arborist should know that. Google can help if you don’t know these things. :)

The regrowth tends to be tall, straight and useable, hence the delayed cutting. As I mentioned in an earlier post, try Google and search for Basque Country Beech forests or Burnham Beeches in the UK.

1B6B3510-9786-4FF5-A4BA-25B83CA04F9C.jpeg
 
Last edited:
If you want to call Mick's hackery pollarding, then so be it.



Call it what you want, doesn’t bother me, it’s a difference in how we manage trees in Europe compared to the US.
Those trees are in a location where they can’t be allowed to develop to a mature size and have been trimmed/topped/pollarded since the second World war, they’re still there and will probably see the both of us out.

What’s you’re suggestion? Fell and replace? Would that be preferable?
 
Good article Rich. When I get some time, I'm gonna see if I can find more on it. Pruning with axes is a novel idea to me. I'd like to see exactly how they go about it.
 
Good article Rich. When I get some time, I'm gonna see if I can find more on it. Pruning with axes is a novel idea to me. I'd like to see exactly how they go about it.

There is a great thread on Arbtalk. Started by the guy who had a hand in the article, David Humphries.



275AD201-66D2-446C-A23D-A3A345866D5B.jpeg
 
Sycamores and Mulberry are the most common pollards in my parts. Metro and urban areas. It slows the trees down that's for sure. Keeps them contained in limited space. The trees look great during the active growing season and the practice really doesn't appear to cause major harm. The trees just keep on going.

Because pollarding is done at 'mostly' regular intervals I've always referred to it as a system of rouge prunning.

Back around 03 or so some young arbs at the Tree Buzz tore into some Brits after they posted some images of pollarding The response was fast and furious and the young punks soon realized they were up against something (a cultural practice) much bigger and older than they ever realized. They were taught a lesson real fast.

History keeps repeating itself.
 
Here's a crape myrtle that I topped recently. The picture is old but we've topped this one every year for the last 20 - 25 years or so. Oh, wait. Topping kills trees!

Bertch crape myrtle pollard.jpg

Vive la différence!
 
I just did my one pollard, a catalpa, last week.

Locally, an insurance agency has pin cushions for pollard heads as their central landscaping, where the landscapers could do a good job, simply by cutting everything 1-2" shorter. Only looks bad 6 months a year.
 
Interesting read on arbtalk thx for the link. It mentions the still common pollarding of young trees for “winter fodder,” guessing goats?
 
I’d halfta say yes... probably... goats (well, I suppose all ruminants) are enormously benefited from all the vitamins in that stuff.

Redskins ate all that stuff up too until only quite recently. We gotta go back, not forward.
 
It's been really interesting observing the different tree work/ pruning across America. Im currently in Carmel CA, and a bunch of the parking lot "utility" trees are pollarded. In Louisiana and Texas, many trees were just topped, with awful flush cuts.

Pollarding is really just super aggressive reduction pruning, and certainly has its place. To my eye it spoils the aesthetic of the tree, but in many places it makes sense from a maintenance perspective.

A saying at my old job in Boston was "no one looks up". Said to justify wicked hard reductions on big declining trees to preserve the bole. They had been maintaining basically hollow shells on the Boston commons for decades using that approach. Sometimes it's either a removal or Pollard/ reduction
 
Back
Top