I use it, but then I'm European, too.
I do it a little different, but basically the same cut.
I make a slightly (downward) angled top cut first, make it as deep as is practical, like stig says, so they just fall over... then make the flat cut-(bottom of the face), and don;t even try to make the two face cuts match evenly.. instead make the bottom (flat cut) an inch or so high purposely, so two cuts will definitely bypass. Once the bottom cut has bypassed the top cut, just keep cutting..... straight back, til the piece starts to settle just a hair... pull the saw out, and nip the back strap, and the piece just falls right over, directly into the face.. NO HINGE... it simply falls that way cause it has to... There is no need for the control a hinge offers.. so its ridiculous to make the effort to create one, then have to make that much more effort to push the piece.How do you do it differently?
I use it quite frequently. The low "back-cut" lets you cut past where the hinge would be & not have the sawed pulled out of your hands. Limited control so it has it's place.
Ok, I get it.I make a slightly (downward) angled top cut first, make it as deep as is practical, like stig says, so they just fall over... then make the flat cut-(bottom of the face), and don;t even try to make the two face cuts match evenly.. instead make the bottom (flat cut) an inch or so high purposely, so two cuts will definitely bypass. Once the bottom cut has bypassed the top cut, just keep cutting..... straight back, til the piece starts to settle just a hair... pull the saw out, and nip the back strap, and the piece just falls right over, directly into the face.. NO HINGE... it simply falls that way cause it has to... There is no need for the control a hinge offers.. so its ridiculous to make the effort to create one, then have to make that much more effort to push the piece.
This bypass face and back release is quick and easy...
Tom does it that way too .Interesting. I avoid the saw grab by cutting level with the face cut.
I start out by making a horizontal cut almost all the way through the stem. I keep an eye on the cut and only stop when it starts to close.
Then I make a 45 degree upwards cut creating what is basically a hinge-less Humboldt.
With a snipe on the bottom of the face cut, the log is almost out of the spar when the hinge breaks. That's nearly a free fall.I don't see the advantage of a humboldt in this situation.
Ian: Thanks so much for posting the vid. Great taste in music btw. Hey, I caught your line about "making the timber hit flat." Have you heard of Jerry Beranek's 18% rule? Man, it's sweet for taking down tall, straight stems. We'll bust the top our of a 120' Fir, so now, you've got a 100' stick. Descend eighteen feet. (If you are six feet tall, then kick the bark off of that pig with your spurs to mark-off six-foot increments three times (18' log). Now saw your face-cut at least 60% of the way through the pig (straight stem, mind you). Torch it off with the back cut.... Bam! The log just did a 270 degree flip, and landed flat and safe (if it's been raining) usually is up here, so no worries. Next log: 14.76'. Next one: 12.1' etc. Man, I owe Jer the world for that little trick.
Tarzan: Thanks as always. Well sawn!
ARBPORN!!
Ian, is that sloping release back cut so that you can be sure to cross the plunge kerf? Any risk of a saw snatcher that way?
Many use a horizontal release cut slightly below the plunge.
Is that thuja plicata, what we call western redcedar or western red cedar?
I do have his DVDs but when i get the chance to watch TV i get 5mins in and the wifes like WTF!! ARBPORN!! I do really need to watch through them.