Merle, what would prevent you from simply sticking a couple of wedges in a tree with that much backlean, to hold the kerf open, while you completed the cut.
Then after setting whatever hinge thickness you deemed necessary, step out of the danger zone and signal the skidder driver to pull.
That is how I do it.
Also, if I know something is going to barberchair while I'm near, I wrap a logging chain around it. I keep a short, selflocking one in the truck during logging season for that purpose.
Stig, possibly only inexperience kept me from doing that. This is 15 and 20 years ago and I’m working mostly from general recollection as opposed to having the exact picture of a particular tree in mind. Lets call these adrenaline induced recollections.
These were Blue Gum Euc.s. We would be taking down groves or hedge rows of dozens or hundreds. Some 3 and 4 foot dia. some down to 8 in.. Usually we had a timber faller come down and do most of that while I set trees up in advance. At times he wasn’t there and I would do some falling while my friend operated the skidder.
So, all the stuff that will fall is on the ground and processed. By the way it’s all going out to be chipped and shipped to Japan. I think the only specs were, shorter than 45 ft., nothing bigger than 3 ft. dia. or smaller than 6 in.. All the trees that have some back- lean, and all the trees that have some back limb weight but are comfortable pulls are done. (Used wedges all over the place so far.)
Most of the trees that are left I would vote that I climb them and take them apart in some form. No, my buddy wants to pull them, ”no problem” he says. At stake are things like 5 and 10 thousand gallon water tanks, high voltage power lines, neighboring vineyards in full production, and county roads with occasional traffic. Between his ‘no problem’ attitude, and my ‘can do’ attitude, I feel like we are pushing at the boundaries pretty hard.
My friend used to want a big open face. So I am already a little over one third into say an 18 in. dia. tree. (One of my concerns was that we were going to rip a tree right off it’s stump and it would continue falling in the direction of it’s lean.) I already had him tension the tree and watch the top move some feet. Face is in, add a little more tension, start the back cut. We were often breaking over a lot of hingewood on a tree like that, 6 in. minimum maybe up to 10/12 inches. Not infrequently I wanted to start a hard pull at 12 inches of wood and stayed on the cut, relieving the back of the hinge to prevent a barber chair and loosing a tree into X. (No significant room for wedging and I already knew the skidder had it barring catastrophic failure.)
Today I still wouldn’t say that I would be entirely comfortable with the idea of falling those trees. If I were willing to do it without taking the tree apart first, I would do things differently. I would like to practice the ‘Step Cut’ on some easier pull trees. Then when I got to the harder ones I believe I would hold for moving the big open face back to one third of the tree or slightly less. I am envisioning that I could bore in leaving 5 or 6 inches of ‘backstrap’ and cut forward to my finished hinge, maybe 8 inches of wood. Out and down a little and make the back step cut. (I would even look at the idea of leaving a fraction of an inch of holding wood there that needed to shear as the step broke away.) Of course all of these trees would be sporting a logging chain ‘barber chair restricter’.
What I would get by this method in my estimation would be a tree set up to fall without me needing to be on the stump, stability to hold itself while I get out of the way, and a tree that will go in the proper direction without barber chairing by virtue of a reasonable hinge and a chain as a safety measure. I’m not doing this today but, any thoughts?