I have no paranoia about anyone taking away my guns, i don't own any. I'm burned out discussing guns, when one of these incidents comes along, every point of fact that might possibly have been previously said to show a reasoned argument by FAIRLY interpreting the statistics that reveal that guns aren't the problem, gets forgotten like they never existed. It becomes a tedious and pointless waste of effort to go through it all again. I don't know if the anti gun people are simply being stubborn, or some other problem preventing the assimilation of information exists, but that generally seems to be how how it works.
Guns have saved a lot of people, but why bother posting those statistics that I have found on it. I've concluded that the right to own guns or the prevention of such, is a meaningless discussion. People complain about guns then get quiet when the unbiased facts or ones not altered or fully portrayed to support the anti argument get shown, then something happens and they start all over. It's a cycle.