Cobleskill
Treehouser
I was there in 99 and 02. 02 got rained out. Good times other than that. We camped in a close by I guess state place the first year and froze the first night. Campground was a zoo. Bunch of crazies.
After I thought about it I said I think I know who that was.
Thanks! I appreciate that! Yes, the moon caused everything in the foreground to light up the way it did. The trees protected the camera, allowing me to capture the stars during the exposure. Can't wait to find more great photos...and better yet, start taking more great photos. I somehow had forgotten how much fun it is. I've sort of been obsessed with tree climbing for the last two years, so I think it sort of pushed photography out of the way for awhile. Who knows, though?I like the way that whole thing's framed, and the moon(?) just out frame makes the trees look cool.
Sounds a bit like the gambel oak we have here...Helped Mike remove a couple hangers from a sawtooth oak on a job we did earlier this year. It wasn't much to do, but he had the trailer hooked up, and everything was ready to go, so he gave me a call. I didn't do much. Just picked up debris, and sent tools up to him. Windy as hell. I've seen sawtooth oak before, and had a little interest in getting one of my own, but not after today. Very weak tree. There isn't much to them. Easy to break limbs, and the insides look rotted, even though the wood's fine. It's like the fibers are barely holding it together. I'm not impressed.
Surely you will remove the photos from Lr before the subscription ends, so they aren't locked in there. I use Exposure, which is similar, but no subscription.Today, I spent an hour talking to my father on the phone about various whatnot. After that, I somehow randomly began retaking interest in my DSLR camera for the first time in four years. I decided that tomorrow I'm going to start doing photography again, and charged my camera batteries, cleaned all of my lenses, and have plans to go to this huge sandstone formation near my house. It's a very large park, and the only place close to me that has no lights on.
I was so inspired that I even re-bought a subscription to Lightroom, which unlocked tens of thousands of photos that I've taken many moons ago. It's a lot of fun to rediscover these photos now that I'm even more skilled at editing. I already know that there's a TON of very impressive, high speed photos of wildlife (mostly birds) waiting to be located and re-edited. I still have thousands of photos to go through and label (I never used to label my folders; they all just have dates; stupid).
Here's one of the better shots I've come across so far. It's a long exposure, nighttime photo of the ISS (International Space Station) passing over my parent's house. Pretty nifty. That isn't easy to do, let me tell you. You basically only have one or two attempts to get the shot before it passes overhead and out of frame.
View attachment 136902
Nice pic, and house. I'm a little bummed in that I thought you actually got a good pic of the ISS up close, like through a telescope. That's super challenging.Today, I spent an hour talking to my father on the phone about various whatnot. After that, I somehow randomly began retaking interest in my DSLR camera for the first time in four years. I decided that tomorrow I'm going to start doing photography again, and charged my camera batteries, cleaned all of my lenses, and have plans to go to this huge sandstone formation near my house. It's a very large park, and the only place close to me that has no lights on.
I was so inspired that I even re-bought a subscription to Lightroom, which unlocked tens of thousands of photos that I've taken many moons ago. It's a lot of fun to rediscover these photos now that I'm even more skilled at editing. I already know that there's a TON of very impressive, high speed photos of wildlife (mostly birds) waiting to be located and re-edited. I still have thousands of photos to go through and label (I never used to label my folders; they all just have dates; stupid).
Here's one of the better shots I've come across so far. It's a long exposure, nighttime photo of the ISS (International Space Station) passing over my parent's house. Pretty nifty. That isn't easy to do, let me tell you. You basically only have one or two attempts to get the shot before it passes overhead and out of frame.
View attachment 136902
Yes, you're definitely right about being able to access photos without a subscription. I meant "unlocked" more in the sense as it basically opened some kind of proverbial door which led me to rediscover my old photos. But yeah, you're right about that. My comment was ambiguous.Surely you will remove the photos from Lr before the subscription ends, so they aren't locked in there. I use Exposure, which is similar, but no subscription.
Nice pic, and house. I'm a little bummed in that I thought you actually got a good pic of the ISS up close, like through a telescope. That's super challenging.
Yes, you're definitely right about being able to access photos without a subscription. I meant "unlocked" more in the sense as it basically opened some kind of proverbial door which led me to rediscover my old photos. But yeah, you're right about that. My comment was ambiguous.
Sorry I disappointed you. The biggest lens on my camera is 300mm; it's a telephoto lens that I use to take high speed shot of birds in flight and doing bird things (lolz). I also take pictures of basically any type of wild life, along with scenery/nature. I do some astrophotography every so often, but I would need a powerful telescope that is immensely out of my price range in order to take a close up shot of the ISS.
I'm more interested in doing time lapse of sunsets and sunrises (et cetera), shooting light trails from cars with long exposure, or taking shots of the stars, and various other types of photography, like macro. I definitely hope that someday I'm able to buy a telescope of that caliber. My old neighbor used to have a super intense, massive telescope, and we would drive to where there is less light pollution and take pictures of galaxies, nebulae, comets, asteroids, satellites, and of course planets and their moons. He would have his laptop in the back of his SUV. He could put in coordinates and the telescope had motors that would move it to the exact spot of the celestial object inputted.
Anyways, thanks for your input. It's appreciated!