If either Stig or Mick posted about an issue in their country/neighborhood/etc that was adversely affecting them or their lifestyle, I can’t fathom mocking that issue.
Sure, employment mandates have been around for years. But not like this one.I happily mock anything, even myself.
As for the , get the vaccine or lose your job, thing, plenty of that already.
Lots of companies in Europe will fire you for wearing religious symbols.
We got tired of all the hijab clad muslims, and in order to not look like a bunch of racist, every religious symbol was included.
Also lots of places the opposite is through...............not wearing a hard hat will get you fired.
Wanna get on the barricades protesting aganst the tyranny of hard hat mandates?
Or against mandatory drug testing.
Better bring lunch, it'll be a long time on those barricades.
Who’s being cryptic now?Treesmith circling the drain I see.
Thanks, Sean.
Stig, Jim was referencing iconic American advertising figures (Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben's); fictitious black figures who never bothered anyone (black or whit4e) until "wokeness" became the latest religion.
Got that part, even though I prefer Maple syrup on my hotcakes, not imitation.
It is the pictures of working black people that has me stumped.
Got that part, even though I prefer Maple syrup on my hotcakes, not imitation.
It is the pictures of working black people that has me stumped.
Ity's off0-patent... Mick we don't often agree, but even at that, you rarely sound so foolish.I don’t believe it tbqhwy.
If Merck thought it was the wonder drug they’d be pushing it.