How does the sequoia compare to the glide II saddle?
The Sequoia, the TreeMotion, the TreeFlex, are all what is known as 'hybrid' saddles.
All of them tout the advantages of light weight, and a substantial advantage of having designs which are suited to the climber who desires a floating bridge, multiple gear loops, and leg support designs which allow the climber's legs to move freely.
The Buckingham Glide is a saddle which attempts to incorporate these designs but in a more durable saddle design.
My main complaint about the Glide is that the bridge design is faulty in that it is very restrictive. The bridge attachment points are bulky which get hung up when your climbing line slides to one end or the other. Buckingham 'solved' this issue with putting rubber washers on each end to prevent the climbing line ring (or biners), from touching the very end of the bridge.
The Glide saddle back is stiffer (yes more durable) but it results in a poor fitting back pad which slides down over the climber's hips and has to be pulled up continuously. Also the Glide webbing straps dont stay put (for me) and have to be worked at to maintain the 'setting' because they loosen. The buckles are large, and when I used the saddle in work, they would bite into the flesh of my legs, and stomach.
Some climbers really like the Glide. Search through the forums here and you will see some pictures of Old Monkey wearing this saddle. I think some good ones are in his thread about shoveling snow off of a roof.
When you look at the picture, you will see that the saddle is hanging pretty low on Old Monkey's hips.
For him, this saddle works. It is all a matter of personal preference.
for me, this is unacceptable.
ALL OF WHAT I JUST WROTE IS MY PERSONAL OPINION