Ivermectin vs. Covid and the vaccine

  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #581
If you looking for a script for Ivermectin just to have on hand, you can get one at this web link by filling out there medical forms on line.

https://sevencells.com



There is a large yellow link at the top of this web site that says Looking for Ivermectin, click there and fil out the form. I found this link form the below article.

Good luck, Jennifer


https://www.thedesertreview.com/content/tncms/live/
Court Orders Ivermectin: Human Rights & Truth Prevail
THE RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY, AND HAPPINESS MEANS THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE MEDICAL TREATMENT
Today the top news is no longer poison control calls for a horse de-wormer. It is no longer about fabrication and deception. Today, the truth prevails and drowns out the paid propaganda. Today every American and world reader can see that Ivermectin's headlines reveal ANOTHER court has ordered the hospital to follow a patient's wishes and administer Ivermectin.
Judge orders Cincy-area hospital to treat COVID-19 patient with ivermectin, despite warnings - https://www.fox19.com/2021/08/30/judge-orders-cincy-area-hospital-treat-covid-19-patient-with-ivermectin-despite-cdc-warnings/
All the power and money of Big Pharma working with Big Regulators could not prevent this news from coming out and indeed dominating the current events on a drug called Ivermectin, one that science shows is FDA-approved as safe for patients with scabies and rosacea, one that has eradicated the disease of River Blindness in most of the world, and a drug that 63 different studies with 23,000 patients have shown is up to 96% effective in reducing preventable death in COVID-19.
www.ivmmeta.com
Ivermectin is also increasingly being used to treat cancer.
Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/
Use of the Anti-Parasitic Drug Ivermectin to Treat Breast... : Oncology Times - https://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/fulltext/2021/05050/use_of_the_anti_parasitic_drug_ivermectin_to_treat.4.aspx
Ivermectin is safer than Tylenol or aspirin and has been prescribed in billions of doses over 40 years. It only became dangerous when Big Pharma saw it as a competitor to their expensive and less effective solutions.
Are you for the right of a patient to receive the medical treatment they request, or for the Big Pharma, Big Regulators and Big Media who want you to believe what is not true - that Ivermectin is ineffective, dangerous, and only for de-worming horses and cows?
If you believe that, then you owe it to yourself to read this:
Gaslighting Ivermectin, vaccines and the pandemic for profit - https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/gaslighting-ivermectin-vaccines-and-the-pandemic-for-profit/article_19f42a96-05c5-11ec-8172-d776656bad51.html
We are only talking about the doctor-prescribed Ivermectin for humans, and we are not talking about veterinary Ivermectin. And most importantly we are talking about fundamental human rights, specifically the God-given right of each of us to choose our medical treatment.
Ivermectin for the World - https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/ivermectin-for-the-world/article_2aa653ca-b1ae-11eb-903e-a78b2b053ba4.html
Dr. Justus R. Hope, writer’s pseudonym, graduated summa cum laude from Wabash College where he was named a Lilly Scholar. He attended Baylor College of Medicine where he was awarded the M.D. degree. He completed a residency in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation at The University of California Irvine Medical Center. He is board-certified and has taught at The University of California Davis Medical Center in the departments of Family Practice and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. He has practiced medicine for over 35 years and maintains a private practice in Northern California
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #582

Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed. Barriers to reporting include a lack of clinician awareness, uncertainty about when and what to report, as well as the burdens of reporting: reporting is not part of clinicians’ usual workflow, takes time, and is duplicative. Proactive, spontaneous, automated adverse event reporting imbedded within EHRs and other information systems has the potential to speed the identification of problems with new drugs and more careful quantification of the risks of older drugs. Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.
 
Forgive my ignorance, is ivermectin the horse de-wormer? Some folks in Canada de-wormed themselves recently.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #588
Yes, it is, and yes I forgive your ignorance.. the idea of calling this drug a "horse dewormer" is a way of discrediting the drug in the eyes of the public The inventors of Ivermectin won the Nobel prize as it is one of the most important anti-parasitics ever invented. Ivermectin has pretty much cured African river-blindness. It is estimated that this drug has saved over 8 million man-years of disability.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #589
THE PROPER SAFETY TESTS WERE NEVER DONE The FDA made the mistake of regulating the three COVID vaccines as a vaccine exclusively. As a result, the dose, duration, and amount of spike protein produced by these vaccines were never measured in advance of approval by the FDA. Today, despite the evidence of unforeseen and unprecedented harm, these three critical parameters are still completely unknown. Why haven’t these tests been done in non-human primates with the actual vaccine? THE D-DIMER AND CRP BIOMARKERS ARE A SMOKING GUN THAT THESE VACCINES ARE NOT SAFE Even more concerning is that there has been no attempt to measure biomarkers that could clearly show that these vaccines are causing unexpected harm. For example, measuring C-Reactive Protein and D-dimer of people before and after vaccination is a very simple experiment to show that the vaccines are causing problems. Multiple researchers (contact us for the details) have done such a study in hundreds of patients and found that both biomarkers are elevated above normal levels for around three months in over 60% of patients. This is very serious. It is a smoking gun that indicates that something is very wrong with these vaccines. For example, a 73 year-old female on her second dose had a D-dimer of 1186 ng/mL Page 7 (normally it is less than 250 ng/mL) two weeks after the shot. It remained above normal for three months. AN OVER-RELIANCE ON DELEGATED TRUST HAS MAGNIFIED SMALL ERRORS INTO LARGER ERRORS We live in a world of delegated trust. But if the root of that trust makes a mistake, it creates a ripple effect where the consequences are magnified exponentially. Our first example of amplified errors due to delegated trust is the safety signal detection of the VAERS database that John Su at the CDC has been monitoring. The ACIP committee trusts the CDC staff to monitor VAERS. If there is a bug in the monitoring algorithm used by the CDC, the CDC will miss the critical safety signals and the ACIP committee will not be alerted. ACIP members do not have the time or expertise to analyze the VAERS data themselves, as it is not a simple task, requiring many months of dedicated effort using specialized tools. If such a critical safety signal is missed by the CDC, there are immeasurable consequences and harm to the public. When we looked at the VAERS database, we found dozens of very serious safety signals that the CDC failed to detect. The attached analysis (see Attachment 2, page 17) shows that every neurological and cardiovascular event that we investigated was strongly elevated as compared to previous vaccines, most by at least 10X and some by as much as 473 times higher than what is normally expected in a typical year across all vaccines. This is impossible to explain if the COVID vaccines are perfectly safe.
 
Also is India even doing covid tests? If they aren't able to test of course you won't have confirmed cases. Got a first vs 3rd world country thing going on there. Be smarter than the meme
 
Kyle, if you don't understand the worthlessnes of the PCR testing, well documented by the WHO and the inventor of the test, I can see why you'd want your confirmation bias confirmed. India's numbers represent people hospitalized for Covid, and let me check the numbers??? India has 1.2 billion people, and Israel has what, maybe 15-20 million ( don't go quoting me on exact population numbers; India has multiple dozen times more people). So, irregardless of testing, Israel is a literal shit show compared to India, and all those who took the jab representing the majority of recent cases there. Their medical authorities even complained about that and the big cheeses just said "Well they need more boosters". Media here doesn't report that, but overseas media does a better job than our "captured press".
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #597
check out the following info from Germany and compare that to the US where not one autopsy has shown the vaccine to be the cause of death..


Peter Schirmacher with the University of Heidelberg in Germany reports that his group has studied 40 people who have died within two weeks of vaccination; he concluded that around 30% to 40% of the total did truly die from the vaccine. This particular researcher believes that the overall deaths following vaccination are underreported. Yet the mainstream here in Germany disagrees—such as the Standing Vaccination Commission and the prestigious Paul Ehrlich Institute. As is the case in most developed worlds, actually proving the vaccines cause deaths is very difficult.

The Autopsy Project

Professor Schirmacher heads an autopsy project in the southwest set up so that physicians and researchers can better understand the disease. This particular COVID-19 autopsy project is supported by funding of about 1.8 million Euros per year. The findings, derived from an investigation into over 200 autopsies, have led to better treatment and ventilation of COVID-19 sufferers, reports Schirmacher. He has been a member of the National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina since 2012.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #599
I'm really not sure if this is reliable information... I think it is, but really don't trust Mike Adams...

 
Back
Top