Stephen, you could come to Japan anytime as the dead Pine specialist. Probably quite a reception at the airport!
Correct, Jed, often close to the ground is where the weakest part is from decay from water caused rot. Higher might just be dead and very dried out. It's a slight point of disagreement between myself and my partner at these sights, he wants to take on riskier jobs, and also brings in more work, having a connection to the maintenance company that contacts the owners.
Willie, Rich, kind of an abnormal thing sometimes going on with budgets. The justifiable higher tree removal fees is a good thought, but I'd say that around half the vacation homes in the area don't get used at all any longer, the generation that built them is old or past on, and their children aren't interested in coming out to clean and upkeep the places. You can sometimes smell the mold inside. The only reason that many of the owners even know about the tree situations, is that they get informed by a maintenance association that checks out the properties from time to time, or a neighbour might complain to the town office or something. After the home owner being informed, there might not ever be a reply. People who more readily use the homes will often go for a greater expense for upkeep, like the sometimes better method of craning out trees. Otherwise at best, instead of the possibility of a tree crashing even their unused home that they still pay property tax on, two guys making a couple hundred bucks each for a day or two is all that the owners will consider, doubling that or more with a crane charge makes for not getting hired. My buddy and i want the work, try to figure out ways to accommodate and get those bad boys down. Very few around who want to tackle it.