T Collins
Aloha Arborist
I want one of those soooo badly.
And it looks like it could be the heavy one. It sure was a rotten tree, good timing.Back, up are you using a Husqy?!
Wait a minute are you bashing Husqy's?And it looks like it could be the heavy one. It sure was a rotten tree, good timing.
was the forwarder able to lift that butt??
The weight savings in the 500i over the 572 may be worth it, but one person's dyno test of a 572 vs the 500i shows the 572 far exceeded expectations and book power rating at around 7.1hp, and the 500i was the advertised 6.8hp. The 500i looks to have had 1/3 of a ftlb more torque below 7750rpm.The kid who works with me while my apprentice is at school as an apprentice wannabe ( Means he is bypassing the school, just taking the required courses and trying to learn the rest from me) is a died in the wool Husqvarna fanatic.
Keeps trying to start a discussion about it to no avail, since I don't give a shit.
I run Stihl because the local dealer is most likely the best saw mechanic in the country.
When he retires, I'll maybe switch if there is a good Husky dealer nearby.
IMO Husqvarna has Stihl beat with the smaller saws, up to 60 cc.
Above that, Stihl wins, especially after the introduction of the 500i.
He has a 3120, which looks like it hasn't been run much, if at all, so I let him handle all the large bucking cuts.
Sure put a smile on his face.
His enthusiasm for the work is boundless and he really suck up anything the old fraud shows him.
Fortunately for me, he still has a way to go before he gets the smoothness of operation that caracterizes a really experienced faller, so I put near double the amount of trees on the ground that he does.
Something to feel good about, a bit of hero worship is good for an old semicrippled faller
The weight savings in the 500i over the 572 may be worth it, but one person's dyno test of a 572 vs the 500i shows the 572 far exceeded expectations and book power rating at around 7.1hp, and the 500i was the advertised 6.8hp. The 500i looks to have had 1/3 of a ftlb more torque below 7750rpm.