I have seen western fallers cut above the flare (Cut B) to save felling time, and then also flare trimming time because the mills don’t want flare.
It comes down to where the the additional maybe 6”
of log that an eastern faller gets by trimming flare for a face cut and then trimming the rest of the flares is worth the time. ***critical point - the 6”, or even 4” is probably not worth it by the board foot, but it might mean the difference between getting a whole log or buck out of the tree or not.
In the west, there’s plenty of length to play with and the board foot value is much less. Also, pull doesn’t matter as much because there is so much trim usually. Out east, you can’t fiber pull 6 or 12” out of the butt, it’s not gonna get trimmed. A deep close Humboldt pulls fiber out of a butt log like a claw hammer. The face or back wall of the face cut needs to be vertical back east so that it can’t close and pry, and so the fibers are bent to the breaking point before pulling.
@stikine also made a point I glossed over the first time…the mill scales and cuts from the small end. The saw cuts straight lines…everything outside of that is waste.
Something to consider is that many high value Eastern hardwoods are destined for veneer plants so there is an incentive to maximize the length of the most valuable portion of the tree.
Something to consider is that many high value Eastern hardwoods are destined for veneer plants so there is an incentive to maximize the length of the most valuable portion of the tree.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.