Graeme McMahon
Treehouser
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
- Messages
- 58
If the OP doesn't complain, we don't much worry about derails here, brother.
Never worry about that.
Ok,
If the OP doesn't complain, we don't much worry about derails here, brother.
Never worry about that.
Marc, thanks for all the detailed comments/corrections/advice.
I think I will be changing my Maasdam's anchor! ...... and I need to see what is the application for those "D" shaped steel carabiners..... since evidently not for this!
ha, yeah, trigonometry, vectors, etc. are cool!
ha, I know you are right about the maasdam hook.... but I've already replaced it for the carabiner.... and it gives me a little extra peace of mind since it is *locked* closed instead of just a spring gate, right?
You mean felling like this Graeme?I've been absent from the forum for some time and am not sure if this has been covered.
The logging industry here regards the shallow, open scarfs (notches) and wedges placed immediately behind the hinge as a joke. Shallow notches here increase some risks to the faller and reduce tree control. The open (90 degree) notch provides no increase in safety or control to that of normal notches. Wedges placed immediately behind the hinge reduce safety and control of a back leaner. In our alpine forest where I work, any wedges placed there would be crushed into the stump or the tree would likely split up backwards. You certainly could not wedge the tree as is touted.
It has been introduced here some time ago by some poorly experienced arborist trainers. Despite my best efforts these arboricultural trainers will not engage with our timber industry trainers to align their training with that of the professional fallers. The substandard “arb” trainers use the anonymity of their international source as a form of shield for scrutiny.
I was told that the shallow scarf and other stuff have origins in Scandinavia. Does anyone know the origin of this (manurer)? I look to professional fallers in the country of origin to explain why it was devised and if it is used commercially? In addition if they consider it transferable to the hardwood trees in Victoria, Australia (arboriculture or logging)?
A “yes” answer to the last question, will create an invite to come over here and demonstrate how that all plays out. Alpine bush here is unforgiving unlike the armchair discussions for theorists.
Regards
Some years ago, I saw a vid with a high level climber making a generic demo about tree felling. He wanted to show how to fell a leaning tree, but he put only 2 wedges just behind the hinge. He did it, but had a hard time with a lot of banging. I bet that didn't went as he first expected. He ruined his wedges. I was very disappointed to see that good skill can be paired with bad brain use.
You mean felling like this Graeme?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?ebc=ANy...YLbJefWMkR2dEp6_YIOMMbU7bferrUQ&v=ZQXxXJdWmnw
As a technique for felling a head leaner (without the wedge of course) it is sound I think, but after that, I am unsure of its benefits. It is beginning to be taught here as a generic one size fits all felling method, pushed forward by a consortium of forestry companies and some training providers as the safe felling technique. This is compounded by the way they are taught it - they learn it as a method with little understanding of the underpinning simple mechanics behind tree felling. I am meeting beginners who are struggling to move forward from their initial tuition, as they do not have this base knowledge to build on. They simply do not have enough information to enable them to make good decisions when things become less straightforward.
I spent only a brief time at your end of the world, but long enough to understand how different it is with regards to species & method compared to here in the UK. I think that every place in the world has developed the most suitable methods for its own specific species, topography, climate, markets etc & trying to impose limiting or detrimental constraints to working is shortsighted and perhaps dangerous.
Why the frig put a wedge in a headleaner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is about the stupidest thing I've seen in a long while.
If you can't determine lean in a Beech, get an office job.
The Danish forestry school pulls that one as well.
Come on, either the tree has head lean, in which case you fell it with a back strap or it does not, in which case you set a wedge.
Doing both is like holding a huge sign saying : " NEWB!!!!!!"
People do some whacky shit sometimes in the name of 'innovation'. Atleast here worksafeBC seems to have a somewhat firm grasp on reality and functionality in regards to felling trees.
Graeme, I have that problem every time my apprentices take classes in the forestry school.
My kids ( Usually about 30 years old, but to me they are kids) will say, My master told me to do so and so, and they will be told that it is wrong.
15 or so years ago I had a deal with the forestry school that they would bring classes out to see me log mature hardwoods.
That ended when I felled a 140 year old beech with a bit of front lean and simply cut my way out of any trouble.
When thet tree was safely on the ground, the teacher said, " I would have liked to see a back strap on that tree"
So I asked him if he figured that I was unable to tell lean in a tree after having killed Becch on a commercial scale for 40 years. ( It was a calm day, no wind)
That was the last time they came visiting.
Why the frig put a wedge in a headleaner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is about the stupidest thing I've seen in a long while.
If you can't determine lean in a Beech, get an office job.
The Danish forestry school pulls that one as well.
Come on, either the tree has head lean, in which case you fell it with a back strap or it does not, in which case you set a wedge.
Doing both is like holding a huge sign saying : " NEWB!!!!!!"
When the wedge dips, it's like a needle on a gauge, telling your the tree is moving, I'd think he means.
Finding the source of this wrong information appears elusive but remains the platform for its continuation.