I admire your creativity, but without seeing these in action it gives little credence to your creations, at least if your intent is to create useable hitches for SRS/MRS. I see many shorts on your channel with new hitches, yet I don't actually see any being used at height. I think before the majority of your viewers will trust that your hitches are operable, it'd inspire confidence to watch you working with these hitches in the tree. Being able to see how it grabs, takes up slack, how easy/hard it is to advance, how long you could ascend on it before having to readjust, whether it locks up on descent or runs smooth, how much sitback each has, all the really important things which truly define a useable hitch.
How many of your creations would you say are pragmatic for arborist? I'm certainly not challenging you. Genuinely curious. I love trying out new hitches and putting new (to me) spins on old ones. Nothing as fancy as your stuff, but certainly something which benefits me when I'm using a hitch-based system. I ran a wrench with a Michoacan for years til I rotated the legs 180 degrees, which evidently is called the "Petroacan". Didn't realize there was a name for it. I was just trying to get the hitch to be more responsive. My RRP gets most of the attention now, but I'll still use the wrench when I need 2 climbing systems in decurrent trees.
So my humble suggestion would be to dedicate more time showing the use of these hitches, discuss the nuances, and eventually develop an ongoing dialog between you and your viewers about them. They could then give their feedback and suggestions after trying them out. Just cranking out new shorts of new creations every few days with no real discussion of those creations, much less showing them in action, seems to be much more about the sizzle than the steak. These are just my opinion/s.