- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #26
Hard to say which I'd prefer if I had them in hand to compare. I still disagree with you that the DTX is "more accurate" by design, as it is nearly identical to the APTA from the valve forward. As to catching 1000# marlin on 50# mono, that's entirely different. Reel drag plays a large part in that, and you're only pulling the fish through the water, as opposed to pulling a rope through or over obstruction, which often has NO give to it. So they're using 500# test mono? My spectra is 450#, and I have one set up with 1000# Dynaglide.
oh wow your using some strong stuff. From what ive seen the air chamber hits the tube a little different and that might make a difference. Apparently these units are in the field with Edison energy because of their durability and accuracy. But again, if you had these units next to each other for the same price you wouldn't go with a stainless steel unit that might be more accurate?

), the clear plastic barrel (which isn't a piping material to actually resist the forces involved), combined with the complicated ass trigger assembly, combined with ridiculously polished "ss" pressure chamber, with fragile pressure gauges sounds like a broken pos in a week. My bigshot works well enough for me, and I weld pipe as a day job, so making an apta would be free and take about 2 beers of time. Did anyone ever do a combustion barrel, a la hair spray, ether, propane, etc. , with the grill starter ignitor for the apta? That's what we used for our potato guns mainly, complete with breech loading for ease of spraying, and a tube on the barrel to hold the broomstick ram just like a black powder rifle.