chris_girard
Treehouser
I'd say zero sit back
Thanks Willie. That is what I like to hear.
I'd say zero sit back
When adjusted proper... No set back. The thing is as smooth as silk.
Don't use a Rope Walker system much. I prefer the Sit-Stand aka Frog Method better....
Really? Have you used a properly functioning knee and foot ascender combined with a chest harness tending a multicender?
No comparison and no going back for me.
Low and slow. Test... But easily adjusted once in the tree as well in case. It has two adjustment points. So you really need to dial it in just like a hitch for the rope you are using. Is it sliding when you weight it? Tighten the cam (s). Is it binding too hard? Loosen a cam or cams. Low and slow.
Then try some short ascents. Up, down... Up ... down... How did it feel? You are already familiar with how your hitch cord works on your rope... This is just a mechanical hitch.. You want it to grab when weighted and tend nicely when advancing.
Like anything, you don't just pull it out of the box and go work climb on it. Common sense.
...Need to somehow combine my tree climbing skills with SPRAT climbing skills....
Center ring on the bridge, just like you would the HH Paul.When you say the center ring do you mean your bridge center ring or the center advancing ring on the device?
I broke an akimbo one time but didn't get to climb on it much
The Blake's hitch came in the early 90s and solved the problem of the climbing hitch creeping.
I learned the taught-line hitch in 1969. Using manila rope. I'm here to tell it was the best damn thing going at the time. By the mid 70s synthetic rope (nylon) had essentially replace natural fiber rigging in the arborist trade. The Blake's hitch came in the early 90s and solved the problem of the climbing hitch creeping. What a godsend. In the mid 90s the French Prussik with the minding pulley improved climbline control dramatically better. By the year 2000 numerous mechanical devices were being developed, in the attempt, to surpass the current limits of climbline control through fiber on fiber.
Up to my injury, and retirement, in 2007 I tried out practically every mechanical device there was, and in my opinion none of them could beat the control I could get through fiber on fiber.
But that was 10 years ago. Since then a half dozen new mechanicals have made their debut, and I can not help but wonder if they are really as good as all the hype says they are.
With the current development of SRT in working arborculture today it appears the mechanicals have reached a brand new pinnacle in line control.
What's next?