Not so sure I can agree with this last bit, Jer.
On industrial forest lands, managed properly, we can produce all the wood fiber our needs do require, without moving off those original footprints of harvested oldgrowth, now long gone.
I believe it may be wiser land management practice to go with highest efficiency rotations to meet the world's demand for wood, than to screw over more acres by less intensive management rotations.
This of course predicated on the obvious premise that logging has to be on ground and climate that can support sustainable forestry harvest over time.
That is frequently an overlooked requirement, world-wide.
But it is a serious question, and I am certainly in the camp that agree that there are no black and white solutions...it's mostly gray.