Magnus
TreeHouser
Al. This fresh air engine type as we see today is nothing new forced up by EPA or others, I read patents from early 20's that has same principles and it did not work then, I doubt they can change physic's no either.
It is about combustion. A more complete leave less crap for muffler to handle. There is no way to get a engine like these environmentally correct. It goes against its principles.
"Engine with few moving parts and low weight with high power out put"! It was not meant to be fuel efficient or environmentally correct.
Move out of this either by adding parts or weight, better emissions, less fuel, higher output you tip over the principle.
Electronically controlled carb is a step in right direction. Fuel injected in cylinder is next positive they are trying.
Fourstrokes seem not the way to go even though it has been a fun run.
Wankels same thing.
Diesel could work, but is expensive.
Not much small engines left to try...
It is about combustion. A more complete leave less crap for muffler to handle. There is no way to get a engine like these environmentally correct. It goes against its principles.
"Engine with few moving parts and low weight with high power out put"! It was not meant to be fuel efficient or environmentally correct.
Move out of this either by adding parts or weight, better emissions, less fuel, higher output you tip over the principle.
Electronically controlled carb is a step in right direction. Fuel injected in cylinder is next positive they are trying.
Fourstrokes seem not the way to go even though it has been a fun run.
Wankels same thing.
Diesel could work, but is expensive.
Not much small engines left to try...