Never trust a source that pushes only one method regarding tree work. Too many tricks in our bag to get hung up on only one method.
I am surprised to hear that. Does it give reasons ?
Never trust a source that pushes only one method regarding tree work. Too many tricks in our bag to get hung up on only one method.
Speed and strength retention is the incentive for me when I judge it safe to do so....but if I were a teacher like those guys then security would always come first, and I won't argue that there are not better cinching knots out there. You can always cut smaller pieces after all.Never specifically Reg. They do touch on the marl and running bowline, if only to say that you want the wraps to go in the same direction.
It kind of surprised me too coming off the methods the real deal guys like you and Butch (and many others!) were showing us on the Interweb. . . honestly I've been using everything and anything I can come up with while I'm in the tree. haha.
The only reason I can think of would be retention of rope strength. I'm not sure where a locked off clove hitch would fail?? Probably right at the cross yes?
Big fan of slings and steel biners here
. . . it started off good then went great.
Merely imho: If you're worried about a half hitch to a running-bowline causing a line failure, where a clove hitch wouldn't....
man, it's really time to rethink how and why you're ringing that stuff out to begin with. Who wants to yell down, "Hey, this one might break boys, so get even farther away."
Sometimes Jed gets bamboozled by things that arent his style. No biggie. Keep on rockin Reg!