Magnus
TreeHouser
It is not easy this stuff. How X-torq is meant to work is pretty well explained and just as it is supposed to be said. It is not a bad idea, wasn't in the 20's and 30's when it was a new concept either, but it had issues and still do.
Problems is the amount of fresh air in transfers, flow of gasses and pressures. Change any of this and regardless of performance the saw is now not legal as fumes going out are not good enough. For racing it is OK, but not for work here.
The pressures and flow in case and transfers is not the same all the time. Transfers add to crank case volume.
It makes even less sense when you see the flow of gases in a gif.
If you want to alter the X-torq to run well and last, you loose the point of it as you get worse emissions.
Better not to buy it at all...
Problems is the amount of fresh air in transfers, flow of gasses and pressures. Change any of this and regardless of performance the saw is now not legal as fumes going out are not good enough. For racing it is OK, but not for work here.
The pressures and flow in case and transfers is not the same all the time. Transfers add to crank case volume.
It makes even less sense when you see the flow of gases in a gif.
If you want to alter the X-torq to run well and last, you loose the point of it as you get worse emissions.
Better not to buy it at all...