theTreeSpyder
TreeHouser
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2016
- Messages
- 691
The clean class of Sir Burnham, smooth and generous even in critique!
.
Very sorry,my self taught , internal language of force as a conducted element thru me or other device doesn't translate well!
>>i still hope to share that always, to extend a more intuitive, internal 'feel' for these things as i had learned to talk them thru my own architecture as familiars very early(these lessons have been constant life companion)!
.
i must say, there are not very many internal force lessons like this!
.
But more back on topic:
.
These experiments are what brings me to previous noted views of what is going on.
>>Viewing front face on the stump/anchor side as a re-enforcing embankment pushing back/bolstering against the flex of hinge.
This stiffness could be good in some cases or on somedays more flex might be wanted to be allowed.
>>i didn't get to fully play this theory out in as many directions as the rest i have presented over time
>>thus don't push it forward that much
.
Very sorry,my self taught , internal language of force as a conducted element thru me or other device doesn't translate well!
>>i still hope to share that always, to extend a more intuitive, internal 'feel' for these things as i had learned to talk them thru my own architecture as familiars very early(these lessons have been constant life companion)!
.
i must say, there are not very many internal force lessons like this!
.
But more back on topic:
.
These experiments are what brings me to previous noted views of what is going on.
>>Viewing front face on the stump/anchor side as a re-enforcing embankment pushing back/bolstering against the flex of hinge.
This stiffness could be good in some cases or on somedays more flex might be wanted to be allowed.
>>i didn't get to fully play this theory out in as many directions as the rest i have presented over time
>>thus don't push it forward that much
