L
Levi
Guest
Yep
Nope. The HH has other pluses besides just its compactness, nothing around or above the hitch, nothing to engage or set when coming to a stop after an ascent, no additional drag on a limb walk and it does not bend the rope to achieve its frictional component. That last one is a big deal. The HH is an outstanding tool.
I'm probably not going to buy a ZK2, at the moment, as the ZK1 works fine. What kind of proper tether should I buy? A stick taped to the tether works okay, but its not as high performance.
Is there a commercially made tether for the HH1 that helps to keep it oriented? My homemade tech cord does okay, but again, not as high performance as a more purpose built one.
If there were a slack tender buit in I might give it another go. Dave, what's wrong with bending the rope?
Like others have said, if the HH is not tending well it is not setup as well as it could be. But I still use a pulley under mine because it tends even better and gives me no trouble otherwise.
There is nothing wrong with belay tools that bend the rope as a means of friction control, it is how most accomplish it. The fact that the HH doesn't makes it unique. The main advantage to this is consistency. Anything that changes the tension on the tail end of the climbing line, like its own weight difference from the top to the bottom of a tall tree or moving through redirects, will change its load holding. With the HH once it is set it will maintain that setting no matter how much weight is applied below it.
All performance quibbles aside, my biggest gripe with the RW is just how clunky it always felt. I can concede that it tends better or that it's smoother on limb walks, but all that is moot if I don't like the look and operation of the device. And for me the RW felt like it was always in the way during my climb.
What is this stopper you speak of? Pic, please. I need a new tether. I climbed on my RW1 the other day.