MasterBlaster
Administrator Emeritus
You shoulda let it simmered a day or so.
It's probably so if some CA does something criminal and gets sued and the ISA is also named in the suit they can say that "hey we're not responsible, the guy lied to us or we wouldn't have let him be one". And since the guy lied on his application then his certification was never valid in the first place, giving them another out. I wouldn't worry about it. I kind of doubt if they are looking for some technicality to beat you over the head with, they are just trying to show some effort to keep criminal types out.
What really bugged me about the whole program is their are several female CA's in Hawaii (not picking on women, just stating a fact) and I know they have never actually done work in a tree or are even capable of climbing a tree. To me, if you are going to be a CA, you should be capable of doing the work. It is like saying I am a master carpenter, I never did do any carpentry but I did read all the books on building houses, cabinets and furniture.
ISA has become just a money-grabbing org anyways, so I don't really GAF. I'm not re-enlisting, or becoming a LEO, so WTF do they need answers on crap like that for? My record is clean enough to possess a Class A LTC- it just ain't nunoftheirbusiness.
I agree with Willie that it does seem like an intrusion but if this thread is to be worth something people should watch their language and assume that they are talking to someone who is in front of them and is well intentioned, otherwise folk's point of views will be discounted out of hand.