woodworkingboy
TreeHouser
Stands for Japan Railroad, a huge company here that manages the railroads, I guess it's everything except for some other company owned subways in large cities. A friend of mine works for some people that JR contracts with to do arborist work along the lines and around stations, keep potential hazards from trees and whatever might be within that category to a minimum, and also to keep things tidy. A huge and constantly going on job throughout the entire country. My friend asked if I would fill in for him for a few days. I'd seen guys working the lines when I was traveling, and it interested me.
I showed up to find a three man crew plus two guys from the parent company whose job it is to oversee the operation, particularly safety, not really there to direct the tree work, but to oversee the operation in some official capacity should some question arise within their responsibility. The work goes smooth, the guys are pros, and real pleasant people to associate with, everyone busting A and quite courteous. What really got my attention was the lengths the company goes to so as to ensure safety. There's a checklist that they go through every morning, covering PPE and an array of cautionaries and procedures pertaining to the trains coming through. Aside from having the train schedules on paper, the safety guys have some special gear on their waist that catches some kind of signal when a train is a certain distance away and it sends a warning. Upon which they alert the crew and all activity has to stop and the crew raise their arm to acknowledge and you keep it up until the train passes, or if near a station platform where there is a stop, at least until the train quits moving and then acknowledge again when it gets going again. If the work is where the signal can't reach, a call comes in from a station on the line monitoring the train's location. Certain people are well informed of what is taking place along the line, their duty to attend to it. All the same instructions are gone through every morning, the same as the day before with the same crew, plus any special circumstances. What got me though, is that it's also recorded for verification, should there be some circumstance that calls into question whether if there was a proper announcement or not.
At the end of the day, another meeting to briefly discuss the work if needed, and any commentary by anyone is welcomed. Also making sure everyone that is supposed to be there still is.
If there is some physical problem, it's the time to say. Tomorrow's work might be briefly discussed as well.
The whole thing seems a no brainer for the crew, I mean going through the same defined routine everyday as is mandated with every crew wherever they are. JR has an excellent safety record with the crews working the lines, and that's a lot of people, especially this time of year. To some extent all these procedures are a cultural thing, how the people grow up to think and what to expect in a work environment, but it occurred to me that some part of that approach might have some use in other places too, I guess I mean by making safety consciousness a routine. I know that the people in the house generally don't have to worry about local and high speed trains come rocking trough their job sites, but I just thought that there might be some value in mentioning the situation. Anyway, for me it was interesting to observe, the manner of the approach where the thinking is that you can't be too safe where hazards are reoccurring. At least one guy full time is on the lookout.
I showed up to find a three man crew plus two guys from the parent company whose job it is to oversee the operation, particularly safety, not really there to direct the tree work, but to oversee the operation in some official capacity should some question arise within their responsibility. The work goes smooth, the guys are pros, and real pleasant people to associate with, everyone busting A and quite courteous. What really got my attention was the lengths the company goes to so as to ensure safety. There's a checklist that they go through every morning, covering PPE and an array of cautionaries and procedures pertaining to the trains coming through. Aside from having the train schedules on paper, the safety guys have some special gear on their waist that catches some kind of signal when a train is a certain distance away and it sends a warning. Upon which they alert the crew and all activity has to stop and the crew raise their arm to acknowledge and you keep it up until the train passes, or if near a station platform where there is a stop, at least until the train quits moving and then acknowledge again when it gets going again. If the work is where the signal can't reach, a call comes in from a station on the line monitoring the train's location. Certain people are well informed of what is taking place along the line, their duty to attend to it. All the same instructions are gone through every morning, the same as the day before with the same crew, plus any special circumstances. What got me though, is that it's also recorded for verification, should there be some circumstance that calls into question whether if there was a proper announcement or not.
At the end of the day, another meeting to briefly discuss the work if needed, and any commentary by anyone is welcomed. Also making sure everyone that is supposed to be there still is.

The whole thing seems a no brainer for the crew, I mean going through the same defined routine everyday as is mandated with every crew wherever they are. JR has an excellent safety record with the crews working the lines, and that's a lot of people, especially this time of year. To some extent all these procedures are a cultural thing, how the people grow up to think and what to expect in a work environment, but it occurred to me that some part of that approach might have some use in other places too, I guess I mean by making safety consciousness a routine. I know that the people in the house generally don't have to worry about local and high speed trains come rocking trough their job sites, but I just thought that there might be some value in mentioning the situation. Anyway, for me it was interesting to observe, the manner of the approach where the thinking is that you can't be too safe where hazards are reoccurring. At least one guy full time is on the lookout.
