Aircraft & Aviation

Shouldn't have been an issue. In every POH I have seen, checking the position of the fuel selector comes up three times before you ever leave the ground; pre-flight & startup, run-up, and before-takeoff.

I'll have to hunt the NTSB report on this one.
 
Landings are way too easy with wheels....

Put it to you feet, then it gets interesting.

<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/26889209?title=0&byline=0&portrait=0" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0"></iframe><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/26889209">Junction Hang Gliding - Landings</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user1543261">High Time</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
 
The Nazi Flying wing did finally get famous though, remember this...?

Fwing-1-.jpg

without research I say Raiders of the lost ark.

am I right? :D
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #58
For various sentimental and practical reasons, I prefer the harrier. Shame our pathetic government decided to scrap all ours :(

The Spanish and US navy think they're still good enough, but our government thinks it knows better


Brevity and smelling errors courtesy of iPhone using Tapatalk
 
With the Harrier, letting go of the stick and the plane doesn't stay in place, as mentioned, reminds me of an old ten ton crane that I used to work with. No automatic brake on the cable and the operator only had one usable hand. :O
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #62
Not an exclusive problem with the Harrier Jay, most helo's are the same. The Harrier just required a lot of skill to fly. Royal Air force shot down a lot of Argentinian Dassault Mirages by using the stall manoeuvre (VIFF or vectoring in forward flight).

I think its great that the US marine corps refuse to give up their Harriers.
 
The Harrier was a great plane, a huge leap in flight tecnology.

It has been the leading VTOL fighter for 40 years, now it seems something better has come along.

That video was truly impressive ( but then that is what it was made to be!)
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #64
The Harrier never needed a silly pop up sunroof to work :/:
And could VTO with a full payload... unlike the F35

Dont take this vid to seriously... But it is funny :D
<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7q_9YfY6hzw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
We were cruising up the intracoastal waterway in our schooner past Camp Lejune...a Harrier did a vertical takeoff what seemed at the time right next to us..way cool!
Not long after we got boarded by the Coast Guard...
 
It was a bit funny...big burly men hung all about with guns and radios and vests and handcuffs, one got a bit stuck in the companionway which was not built for beefy US sized law enforcement!

Once they realized we were a foreign flag vessel they were very polite and professional, they didn't make us heave too even, just said maintain course and speed and they put the inspectors on board, we were drifting down the waterway under half rig...
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #71
The Harrier is far superior to the F-35, in my opinion as well, Ed.

Interesting you should say that Erik - is that the aviator or the engineer speaking?
I feel the same, but I'm basing my opinion on what some ex RAF pilots have told me.


Brevity and smelling errors courtesy of iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #73
What I've been told, is that the F-35 is ridiculously expensive (massive developement costs), cannot take off vertically with a fuel and weapons payload, burns holes in the decks of ships, and needs a silly sunroof affair flapping up and down to work.
They say that's why the USMC wont relinquish theirs, as the Harrier still does what it says on the tin effectively, whilst the bugs are still not ironed out on the F-35.

Thats just what I'm told, so what the truth is I'm not sure. It does seem odd that with the amount of money its taken, they have'nt developed anything thats significantly better.

Stig, you say the nicest things. When it comes to engineering, I do profess a smidge of patriotism. There was a time when we (British) invented everything and built the biggest and best things in the world. There was a time when buying British made was a Byword for quality. In the words of Herman Goering -In 1940 I could at least fly as far as Glasgow in most of my aircraft, but not now! It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy.

The British, who can afford aluminium better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that?

There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war's over I'm going to buy a British radio set - then at least I'll own something that has always worked!
 
OBSCENELY expensive, yet the Harrier, as you noted... has been around long enough to be much more reliable.

National pride aside, I don't mind complimenting foreign aircraft:

It's a pity the Comet met with so much disaster from it's square windows at first; it was in it's time, and still is one of the nicest looking passenger jets ever made.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #75
Yeah, The Comet was a landmark in passenger Jet design. It broke DeHavilland in the end :(

Actually, you want to talk about an AWESOME American VTOL aircraft?

V-22 Osprey.

<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="360" src="http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x28tro"></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x28tro_v-22-osprey_tech" target="_blank">V-22 Osprey</a> <i>by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/sonicbomb" target="_blank">sonicbomb</a></i>
 
Back
Top