theTreeSpyder
TreeHouser
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2016
- Messages
- 691
Tho both Tim Ard's and my view of sideLean handling exaggerate Natural ballast effect
>>to deliver to a balance of forces between sideLean and it's ballastings
To me, his delivers to where the facing fails to
>>vs. More normal that I think I see from others and own understanding
>>of delivering to where facing faces/ optimally performs to/allows.
From: forestapps.com/tips/tips.htm. >> Side Lean Tips:
"....For example, a tree with 5 feet of right side lean should be aimed at least 5 feet to the left of the intended target. For example, our tree with 5 feet of right side lean must be aimed 5 feet to the left of the intended target."
.
Seems to have own filling, as I believe rfWoody was one; and I have so long over-correctively and politely avoided calling it out, as i can see some logic, still has haunted me over a decade.
.
Does anyone over steer the face like this as ballast, rather than adjust pull (perhaps push) within faced target?
>>to deliver to a balance of forces between sideLean and it's ballastings
To me, his delivers to where the facing fails to
>>vs. More normal that I think I see from others and own understanding
>>of delivering to where facing faces/ optimally performs to/allows.
From: forestapps.com/tips/tips.htm. >> Side Lean Tips:
"....For example, a tree with 5 feet of right side lean should be aimed at least 5 feet to the left of the intended target. For example, our tree with 5 feet of right side lean must be aimed 5 feet to the left of the intended target."
.
Seems to have own filling, as I believe rfWoody was one; and I have so long over-correctively and politely avoided calling it out, as i can see some logic, still has haunted me over a decade.
.
Does anyone over steer the face like this as ballast, rather than adjust pull (perhaps push) within faced target?