Search results for query: *

I hope so too, Gerry, but he's not the only one who maybe oughta reconsider positions after getting informed. ;) What should we learn from observations like The main trunk, which is 5.6 m in diameter at the base and still over 3 m in diameter at 65 m, is devoid of branches for 54 m. Above...

Good idea; actually did send him some stuff (after sending the check) but even then got no reply. Maybe i lack the proper letters after my name. o well. There must be more positive interaction on this.

um well "challenge" was my word not his, alil literary license mayhaps, or thats how i thought it should be heard. and "professional" is your spin. whether his data will inform tree care, that's up to us to find out.

The good doctor should also cop to the fact that his work up there "damages" the trees as well. i talked to him about attribution for the below, but they would not share images for the article--even after i gave $100 to his foundation. pretty elitist yeah; whadja expect? In his 2008 keynote...