Search results for query: *

God your good Steve..... I can't think that quick. Cool names

But did ya think of it in TX or LA???? hmmmm Decisions decisions .....

Now thats a personal touch ;) Especially the Louisiana Pole HAHAHA

Ok must have new name Butch.. LOL hmmmmmm Fish Stringer????

Ya beat me Brian. LMAO

I would try to possibly speed the process up by taking Butches technique and omitting the half hitches and incorporating loop runners. Possibly hitching the biners on each loop runner for binding, but probably not needing to unless there is a limiting space/height issue to a target.

Well a piece of dead limb breaking through roof would be a PITA more so I would think.. besides... I get paid hourly for the rope work..... so if it saves some damage.. You bet!

I agree Steve... I mean why set up all the pulleys when half hitches should do the job of holding each segment and take the load to each segment... Simplify semper fi is what I always say to Rob. My agreement statement when he finds a more simple way to uncomplicate what I complicate .. LOL

HAHAHA Maybe Gerry might name it in his next book LOL ;)

SO in the rigging book it is with pulleys not half hitches. I would think the half hitches would simplify it and the technique would still carry the same name but as pulleyless...

Heck I thinks its a good name there boss. I guess some research would be in order to see if it has a diffy name... But it does fit :)

Looks like it should work... Just as long as you have room to a roof or something to keep it from not working.... I like it actually. Makes sense to at least keep some segments from being lost to gravity vs rot to the load. Nice Boss. I will have to try it :)