Search results for query: *

I'm afraid that it's not a compelling argument, but that's just to me. Thanks for the links and looking it up, Stephen.

Or in the other 2 articles, Stephen. Sorry.

I don't see that 200 year number in that last one?

I did read them, and that's very much not what I read. I will look again. Oops, missed the last one. I will read it.

Maybe so...but just because li battery disposal is hazardous does not mean nuclear waste is safe enough to be of little concern. Keeping anything safely contained for over 20,000 years seems like a risky bet.

I'd be a lot happier to see nuclear power if the safe waste disposal issue was solved.