Search results for query: *

  1. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    And you, my friend. Good night :).
  2. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    I'll have to watch this another time soon, bedtime now :). News to me if that unit works like a screamer. Thanks for the link.
  3. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    I don't think that anchor offers any dynamic or shock absortion feature...am I mistaken? Really hard to incorporate at the climber connection, too long to work with efficiently...but perhaps at the basal anchor. Worth looking at, I guess.
  4. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    You ought to have tried the 10mm...600 feet of it weighs less than 35 pounds...just sayin', from the ninja perspective. :D
  5. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    A very fine advantage. :)
  6. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    Stretch is not a straight line equation like that, it compounds under increasing load if I recall correctly...I have no idea whether two legs stretch half as much as one, but I rather doubt it's that simple Nick. But that aside, it's not really stretch that would concern me, though it certainly...
  7. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    Just because people are using such and such piece of gear for some purpose it was not designed for, doesn't make it appropriate :).
  8. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    None of the lines Nick listed for consideration are suitable for hybrid SRT systems...work positioning. If that's what he's after, it isn't clear to me from his OP.
  9. Burnham

    Static Rope for Tree Climbing

    I had 600 feet of the 10mm HTP when I was working. Stig is absolutely right, it is the ultimate SRT access line...that 600 feet weighed less than 35 lbs.! I bought it in red, not ninja climbing and it helps to be able to see the tie in point from 175 feet away :).
Back
Top